WINNER
PHILOSOPHY
THE 2015 USA BEST BOOK AWARDS
+

To The Editor of The New York Times

Adam Frank’s work in astrobiology is brilliant, but his essay implies that the destructive effects of humanity’s “energy harvesting” are based essentially on physics and might be unavoidable for any intelligent species on any planet. I believe that they’re based largely on greed and fear.

As science progresses, the great challenge is to believe the evidence and act accordingly. It’s not physics but ideologies that stand in the way. Energy harvesting near a bright star like ours can be done indefinitely if we don’t keep reproducing at unsustainable rates and always coveting more and fearing the loss of what we have.

Astrophysicists have already theorized how, as the sun heats up, our descendants can gradually enlarge Earth’s orbit to stay cool. A species that understands all this — as ours now does — can control the consequences of its energy harvesting for billions of years if it considers sacred the call to believe the evidence and protect its descendants.

NANCY ELLEN ABRAMS
Santa Cruz, Calif., Jan. 18, 2015

‹ Go Back

Most of the scientific universe is spiritual! We should be shouting this from the rooftops!
Nancy Ellen Abrams
Most of the scientific universe is spiritual! We should be shouting this from the rooftops!
Nancy Ellen Abrams
Talking to God is not a theoretical exercise for people like me; it can have serious real-world consequences.
Nancy Ellen Abrams
Talking to God is not a theoretical exercise for people like me; it can have serious real-world consequences.
Nancy Ellen Abrams
© 2020 NANCY ELLEN ABRAMS | A GOD THAT COULD BE REAL
CONNECT ON FACEBOOK
© 2020 NANCY ELLEN ABRAMS
A GOD THAT COULD BE REAL
CONNECT ON FACEBOOK